Massive climate-change and forest impacts…

Kyle Corpin
Green America’s Better Paper Project has succeeded in getting one of the largest, most influential magazine publishers in the country to admit the benefits of using recycled paper.  
For years, National Geographic and many other large magazine publishers have denied that recycled paper has any environmental benefit in magazine-grade paper. That’s why the Better Paper Project has criticized these publishers for their massive climate-change and forest impacts.  
In response to our pressure, National Geographiccommissioned their own life-cycle-analysis report to compare the environmental impacts between using recycled or virgin fiber in magazine paper. The results came as no surprise to us: The new study from the ENVIRON International Corporation found that in 14 out of 14 environmental impact categories recycled paper is the better choice.

But it’s not a done deal yet. While National Geographic deserves recognition for a process that was transparent, actionable, and inclusive, their sustainability officer would only commit to letting the new report “inform our own paper manufacturing purchasing practices.”

They need to start purchasing recycled paper NOW. Our Better Paper Project has helped hundreds of other magazines make the switch.  If publications like Fast CompanyYES!Ranger Rick, and the Green American can publish on recycled paper, then National Geographic can too.

Here’s to healthy forests around the globe!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s